Archive for the ‘News’ Category

Windoz 7 4 UR Phone

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

"Golden Days" of Treo

It seems that Microsoft has finally decided to enter the Mobile market with their own OS. Oh what’s that you say? They’ve had a mobile version for years now? Oh yes, I remember now. It was that bland “mini me” copy of 2000/XP, with it’s cute little Start button, it’s cluttered home screen, it’s ‘massive’ collection of some of the worst software to ever be conceived. It replicated all the hardships of Windows in a convenient, on-the-go handheld headache.

Back in the day when “Mobile OS” meant PDA’s (not phones), I remember all the fun I had with Palm’s simplistic, minimalist PalmOS. It made a casual device feel, well, supremely casual. I remember the clean white sheets laced with playful colors on my Handsprings, the slick stylings of the menus on my Clié. Thinking back even further to the powerhouse that was the Apple Newton -  a device so ahead of it’s time, so feature rich than even it’s modern equivalents don’t exceed it functionally – I recall hours wasted playing games, taking notes in classes, even downloading programs straight from the internet. In 1994.

What I remember of Windows Mobile was an unnavigable sea of horrid software, a clunky port of Win2000′s already unimaginative interface, and the inevitability of freezing, crashing, and force-quitting whatever you managed to get running on the retched thing.

The lack of good software wasn’t really the programmer’s fault, however. I remember having to write a program on the platform, nothing too complex mind you, simple data entry with a server-side back end. Getting code to run on it was like a dream … in which I was being constantly beaten over the head with a splintery baseball bat. It’s a shock people bothered coding on it at all.

There’s a reason it’s popularity has dropped year over year and why the devices running it were the first PDA’s to die off and disappear. There was plenty of room for Windows Mobile to grow, but instead they lost ground to a (at the time) comparatively feature-poor RIM Blackberry, whose terrible click-wheel interface, dreadful setup and unreliable syncing stand as a testament to exactly how much worse Windows Mobile really was. When you boil down the argument to it’s most basic form, there is really only one reason Windows Mobile died off:

It sucked.

Not even the most dedicated fanboys have carried the flame. If there ever was a time for it to be born again from the ashes – what with Apple, RIM, and Palm gobbling up all the nooks and crannies in the booming mobile market – this is it.

And so it has been reborn, as the blogosphere is raving, and “Everything is Different”! All I can say is thank god. I hated how complex and frustrating Mobile Windows has been. It’s going to be cleaner, sexier, and so much simpler. So, please tell me, what did they call this revolution?

Windows Phone 7 Series.

Seriously? You’re going with that? That phrase barely makes sense … It sounds like something you’d see spelled out accidentally in magnetic fridge-poetry. Maybe they forgot to name it, and this morning when they wrote the press release, Balmer just started spouting words. “Oh what’s it called? It’s … uhm, windows … ph-phone, yes that’s it, windows phone .. the number seven …. er, series.”

We’re off to a fantastic start.

It’s clear from the name alone that Microsoft has really spent the time to drastically simplify the experience for their end users. NOT. Let me see, since we didn’t spend any time picking the name, they must have spent all of it revamping the interface. You know, really tearing down all their preconceptions and starting from square one.

Well, looking at the new home screen (on the right), I think they took the “square one” thing far too literally:

Left: Old and busted. Right: New hotness.

It’s hard not to improve on the word-vomit of Windows Mobile 6, really. So let’s see, with <do I have to type it? Ugh…> with Windows Phone 7 Series you can see at a glance:

  1. How many phones you have (in this case, 2)
  2. Your collection of canoeing pictures from StockPhotos.com
  3. An animated GIF of the logo for Xbox Live
  4. A mosaic of your ex’s from Facebook

It astounds me how Microsoft always puts emphasis on shear quantity of features over the slightest thought to real usability. Now instead of word-vomit, we  have what I will coin as colored-squares-vomit. This interface is literally assaulting me with color and 90° angles.

While it tip-toes on a ingeniously simple getup, it still manages to miss the mark on what people will probably use it for. A link to my Xbox profile taking up precious home screen real estate? There is literally no reason for me to want to check my Xbox profile anywhere, anytime other than when I’m on the Xbox. I just don’t get why this is cool. You can already look this crap up online, not that it was particularly interesting to begin with. And it made the home screen?

Ok so let’s move on, we’ve got photos, social portals, solitare:

Nothing to big to complain about here. I can’t really say I’m excited about a photo collection on my phone, I guess welcome to the 21st century on that one. I love the idea that I can simultaneously spam Facebook, MySpace, and Twitter at the same time. God knows I love redundancy. The Games section looks pretty sparse, and I am not liking that it’s bookended by ‘Spotlight’ ads on either side. Bleh.

Now let’s get onto the really important part of any mobile platform these days: the internet!

Oh for the love of all that is holy – it’s running f#@%ing Internet Explorer. Blog post over. Seriously, I can’t believe I didn’t see this coming. I honestly thought the only people that still used IE these days were the last 3 AOL users and companies with Stalinist IT departments. Get ready to hate the web all over again!

The only way I think it could be worse is if they integrated it tightly with Bing…

-Andy

The iPad Revolution

Sunday, January 31st, 2010

Here’s the thing – Apple has been doing this for a very long time. If you find yourself saying “Oh the iPad sucks – it doesn’t have blank OR blank …What does it even do? Why would ANYONE possibly need this?!?” … then I’m sorry to say you still don’t get it.

I’ve been hearing these same old tired arguments since 1990 – when people didn’t understand why you’d want a computer that didn’t run Windows. They didn’t understand what you could do with a Mac – “Without Windows how can you _____ (fill in with something from 1990′s software library)??” I won’t lie – the fact was that Windows back then 1) had a much wider set of software available for it, 2) was a lot cheaper, and 3) could be a lot faster. So why would anyone purchase a Mac?

If here, in 2010, you still can’t answer that question, even if you do prefer Windows to this day – then you’d really missed their company philosophy entirely. And that’s a big deal considering how large an influence Apple has in the computer industry these days.

Don’t agree? Then answer me this: How many iPods have you owned so far? If it’s more than 1 … you should really get it. You purchased a product that was probably less-feature rich than competitors at the time (no radio, locked to iTunes, shorter battery life, battery wasn’t swappable, etc.). Why would you do such a thing? The answer is a lot less convoluted than most people admit. It wasn’t what it did, it was how you could use it. Plain and simple – more is less, less is more. Apple time and time again releases products with serious competitive shortcomings when you look at a straight-up feature list, but somehow they gain popularity to the point where they actually define new industry standards for usability.

You might be inclined to think the iPad is no iPod – that it’s uniquely crippled, so let’s take a moment to review. Here is what people said, what Apple fanboys nontheless, said about the original iPod in 2001:


“Gee! an mp3 player with a [hard drive]!” – ooh wow

“$400 for an Mp3 Player! … [It] wont sell, and [will] be killed off in a short time…and it’s not really functional.” - elitemacor

“Any way you spin this it is:
1. Not revolutionary. …
2. A bad fit. …
3. Without a future.” - Meetoo

[via MacRumors]

The iPad is exactly the same kind of product as the iPod was. It’s even got the same reviews. And it is going to be successful for the same reasons. It takes something really rather complex (a whole computer) and boils it down to a uniquely simplistic, casual medium. If you think about the average users out there – many don’t really understand their computers, not entirely. They tolerate them. People don’t really need a nest of files and folders, control panels and installers, device managers and drivers – they just need basic internet access, a way to view and hear their media, and maybe few simple games. The rest is really just trees obscuring the forrest.

Jason McC. Smith of The Microsoft Blog does a pretty good job explaining this:

“Windows and the Mac are, really, just two variants of the same theme: a geek machine. Consumers recognize they don’t need a pro-level machine, so they buy something cheap – but it’s just a badly hobbled pro machine, not a consumer machine.”
[via seattlepi]

Even as a developer, after I get home from work, I don’t really need a Core 2 Duo MBP with 512 MB of VRAM to just browse Reddit. Or even to write these blog entries. I especially don’t need a short battery life, a 6 lb. footprint, and a screaming 100° processor while just watching some TV, or eating a bowl of cereal in the morning. My iPhone would be perfect for these times – if it weren’t too small to browse, or too slow to handle it.

This is where the iPad fits a lot of our lives very nicely. It brings casual computing to the mainstream, in a way that leverages the usability of the iPhone with the size and power of an actual computer. I really think the iPad will spark a whole new era of simple, clean computing, in much the same way the iPod revolutionized MP3 players. In a sea of increasingly convoluted, complex computer systems, Apple has once again rethought the concept entirely, and come up with something that will, in all likelihood, be surprisingly convenient and fun to use.

No one needed an iPod – they were fine with CD’s. No one needed an iPhone – they were fine with their Blackberry’s. No one needed a MacBook – they were fine with their Dells.

And now more than half the laptops on campuses are Macs, everyone and their mother has an iPhone, and most people have owned a half dozen iPods in the short decade they’ve been around. Give it time, wait for the initial shock to wear off and the traditional resistance to die down, and I’d bet you’ll start seeing these things show up in the hands of those you’d least expect.

They called the iPod the “revolution in your pocket” – the iPad is simply the revolution on your desk.

-Andy

You Sure You Exist?

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

I love this – someone wrote to The Consumerist that Comcast refuses to reactivate their service because they aren’t actually sure if they exist:

“Yesterday, our service stopped and that happened again. Only this time, Comcast has decided that *we don’t exist.* Therefore, they will not take the hold off our account until they send someone (in 4-5 business days) out to confirm that we exist.”

Perhaps in a metaphysical sense it’s a valid question. Do I even exist? Does anyone actually exist? Apparently, Comcast isn’t certain of the answer either – but thankfully they’ll be able to figure it out if you could just give them 4-5 business days.

In all seriousness though, couldn’t they just check Google Maps? I’d bet you could Street View them. Consumerist writer Meg Marco has an excellent point too:

“Also, did anyone suspect that Comcast had an ontology department? We didn’t. Anyone have their direct line?”

[via consumerist]

-Andy

What Happened America? You Used to Be Cool.

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

Gotta love the Daily Show, they never let Fox New’s rhetoric fall through the cracks. John Oliver tries to help us figure out which of the ‘Golden Years’ their reporters keep referring to:

You know Fox News, I miss polio too, we all do. It’s also good to know that the Brits think Fox News is as much of a joke as we do:

via [reddit, reddit]

-Andy

Stand By Me

Thursday, December 31st, 2009

Made from street performers and other unknown musicians, recorded literally across the globe with just a laptop and some mics, end result is really awesome.

From Gizmodo:

“It all started with a base track—vocals and guitar—recorded on the streets of Santa Monica, California … was then taken to New Orleans, Louisiana, where Grandpa Elliott—a blind singer from the French Quarter—added vocals and harmonica while listening to Ridley’s base track on headphones … [the] producers took the resulting mix all through Europe, Africa, and South America, adding new tracks …”

[via gizmodo]

-Andy

Backpedaling

Tuesday, December 29th, 2009

In a spectacular ‘one-up’ of Hall & Oats, Shorewood High School filmed an amazing choreographed version “You Make My Dreams.” It’s impressive enough that practically the whole student body participated in this – but the really impressive note is that it was filmed in just a single shot - BACKWARDS.

[via reddit]

-Andy

Corrections for 2009

Thursday, December 17th, 2009

AndyHoffner.com would like take this time to correct several errors which have been reported between January 1st and December 7th of 2009 at AndyHoffner.com and our various affiliates. We regret the mistakes and would like to reassure our readers that factual accuracy is an ongoing priority.

Due to a spelling error in a photo caption in Monday’s article, the word “apostles” was replaced with a “apostate”. The Daily Universe apologizes to the Quorum of the Twelve and our readers for the error.

We would also like to apologize to the admittedly few readers who were mislead into reading what they thought would be a much more interesting article due to the headline:
dekalbhooker

SURREY Police have not blamed gipsies for an attack on their force helicopter, no staff in their operations rooms were threatened by gipsies and no gipsy site was being targeted for a raid as we reported on May 14. More accurate sources confirm that the attack was actually due largely to gnome insurgents. We apologise for the mistakes and are happy to set the record straight.

An article on May 25, 2007, ‘The Cult Guru Who Stole My Son’ made claims that William Van Gordon was a ‘brainwashed zombie’ and Edo Shonin brainwashed him and that the Buddhist retreat which they ran was a cult. We accept this is untrue; The zombie corpse of Van Gordon actually was attempting to wash and then eat Edo Shonin’s brain. We apologise to both men for the contrary impression given.

Saturday’s edition headline mistakenly ran as “Can Dec. anally match Ant?” The original headline was changed from “at last” to “finally” – but left half of the print edition did not receive the update. We apologize to our readers for the rectal trauma.

We would also like to provide our most sincere apologies for a photograph published alongside a story of the annual Kinsmen Santa Claus Parade. We regret that neither the photographer or the [Mod. NSFW] participant pictured were aware of the over-exposure. We would like to inform our readers that the penis in question has been redacted.
Picture in question (from waist up)

View the full listing of 2009′s best corrections from RegretTheError.com

[via reddit]

-Andy

Bon Jovi Would Be Proud

Wednesday, December 16th, 2009

Apparently at some point the JumboTron camera guy became bored with the game and decided that making an impromptu music video with this random dude would be way more interesting.

He was right :)

[via reddit]

-Andy

Sign(s) of the Times

Monday, December 7th, 2009

You just have to take a minute and review this collection of 2009′s best protest signs:

http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/the-50-best-protest-signs-of-2009/

Some of my favorites:

No “Amnety” indeed.

[via FoxNews BuzzFeed]

-Andy

Who Wants a Beauty Queen When You Could Have A Robot?

Friday, December 4th, 2009

Motorola Droid’s newest commercials try to blow iPhone users out of the water by calling their devices “digitally clueless” beauty queens.

Hmm, you know who’s really “digitally clueless”?

“How do they deal with us?” – Ed Zander, Motorola CEO/Chairman on Apple’s New iPhone, 2007

How? They’ll eat take all but a small fraction of your market share, leave the rest to Palm, Rim, and your original competitors, and leave you alone and cold at 1.54%. Lookout iPhone, the Droid is up to .1% of all phones sold!!!

BURN

Dare I make two Star Wars references in a row? I can’t help it – this isn’t the droid you’re looking for…

[via giz, law7355]

-Andy